دانشگاه شهید بهشتی مجله تاریخ ایران 2008-7357 19 1 2026 03 21 British Colonial Interventions in the Structure and Operations of Iran’s Postal Administration) A Case Study of the Abadan and Ahvaz Post Offices ( مداخلات استعماری انگلیس در ساختار و عملکرد ادارات پست ایران مطالعه موردی اداره پُست آبادان و اهواز 31 45 106618 10.48308/irhj.2026.242041.1468 FA الهام ملک‌زاده دانشیار پژوهشکده تاریخ، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی Journal Article 2025 10 17 Abstract During World War I, the British government, under military orders, established nine post offices in southern Iran, including Abadan and Ahvaz. Their continued operation after the war violated Iran’s sovereignty and deprived it of significant postal revenue. Seeking both international recognition as a sovereign state and economic benefits from postal services, Iran officially demanded the closure of these foreign offices through correspondence with the British Embassy in Tehran. This study uses archival documents from Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and a documentary-analytical approach to explore how Iran, amid political, economic, and administrative instability caused by World War I, confronted the British and British Indian post offices. It examines the actions Iran took based on its Law on Postal Monopoly to end British colonial interference. Findings reveal that despite administrative weaknesses and external pressures, Iranian officials were acutely aware of the British offices’ interventionist and hegemonic activities. Through persistent administrative, legal, and diplomatic efforts, they sought to protect national sovereignty and recover Iran’s infringed political and economic rights. This response highlights Iran’s determination to assert its independence and control over its postal system despite significant challenges. Introduction The postal system was a central pillar of administrative governance and state communication in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and served functions beyond a purely technical service. In many settings, postal infrastructure became a means through which political influence and economic control could be consolidated, especially where strategic routes and imperial interests intersected. In the Persian Gulf region, control over communication routes carried particular weight because it supported military coordination and commercial exchange. Within this context, the Persian Gulf route and its connection with India held strategic importance for the British government. The British India Government sought to maintain direct control over the circulation of its administrative, military, and commercial correspondence along this route. The establishment of British and Indian post offices in ports and southern regions of Iran took shape within this framework and in response to Britain’s communication needs and colonial interests. Although these post offices were initially justified as facilitating communication and reducing transfer time, their activities gradually moved beyond the supervision of the Iranian government and effectively placed part of Iran’s postal sovereignty under foreign control. After Iran joined the Universal Postal Union and sought to create a coherent national postal structure, the continued operation of foreign post offices became a serious issue in the realm of sovereign and administrative rights. During World War I, British postal interference intensified in southern Iran. Citing military necessity, the British government established additional post offices in Abadan and Ahvaz and increased the number of its postal centers to nine. The continuation of these offices after the war conflicted with Iran’s domestic laws—particularly the Postal Monopoly Act—undermined the country’s independence and territorial sovereignty, and reduced state postal revenues, weakening the economic capacity of the Ministry of Post and Telegraph during the critical postwar period. Existing studies have often treated the history of postal services in Iran in general terms or addressed colonial interference within broader political narratives. Less attention has been given to the specific operation of British and Indian post offices and to the administrative, legal, and diplomatic mechanisms through which Iranian authorities confronted them, especially on the basis of archival correspondence. The objective of this study is to examine how the Iranian government confronted British and Indian post offices in southern Iran during the final years of World War I, using archival documents to clarify the measures adopted to restrain colonial interference and protect Iran’s political and economic rights. Materials And Methods The present study is a historical investigation employing a documentary–analytical approach based on the examination of archival documents preserved in the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The primary sources consist of official correspondence exchanged between Iranian postal administrations, the Ministry of Post and Telegraph, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the one hand, and representatives and authorities of the British government on the other. These documents were produced and circulated during the years 1337–1338 AH (1918–1919 CE), corresponding to the final phase of World War I. The central research question of this study concerns how the Iranian government confronted the activities of British and Indian post offices in southern Iran during this period and what legal, administrative, and diplomatic measures it adopted to restrain British postal interference. Data collection involved the identification, extraction, and classification of documents related to the establishment, expansion, and operation of British and Indian post offices in Abadan, Ahvaz, and other southern regions of Iran. The selected documents were examined for authenticity, date of issuance, and institutional context, with particular attention given to materials addressing violations of Iran’s postal sovereignty, financial losses incurred by the state, and references to domestic legal frameworks, especially the Postal Monopoly Act. In the analytical phase, the documents were treated not merely as descriptive records but as evidence of legal, political, and economic contestation between the Iranian government and Britain. Comparative analysis of internal Iranian correspondence and communications exchanged with British authorities made it possible to reconstruct decision-making processes and assess the constraints shaping Iran’s response. Result and Discussion Examination of archival documents from the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs shows that the activities of British and Indian post offices in southern Iran—particularly in Abadan and Ahvaz—were not confined to facilitating military or administrative correspondence. During World War I, the British government established additional postal offices, bringing their total number to nine. These offices continued to operate after the end of the war despite Iran’s membership in the Universal Postal Union and the provisions of domestic legislation, most notably the Postal Monopoly Act. Iranian postal officials repeatedly identified this continued operation as a violation of Iran’s postal sovereignty and territorial independence. The documents further indicate that British and Indian post offices handled not only foreign mail but also internal correspondence, often at tariffs lower than those set by Iranian postal regulations. This practice positioned foreign post offices as illegal competitors to Iranian postal administrations. Reports submitted by the Director General of the Post estimate that the resulting loss of revenue amounted to approximately four hundred thousand rials annually, a substantial sum in the context of declining state income during the postwar period. These findings demonstrate that British postal activity in southern Iran functioned as a form of structural interference rather than a temporary wartime measure. The expansion and persistence of foreign post offices undermined Iran’s efforts to consolidate a unified national postal system and weakened the financial capacity of the Ministry of Post and Telegraph at a critical historical moment. The archival correspondence reveals that Iranian authorities clearly recognized the intrusive nature of these activities and consistently framed them as incompatible with national law and sovereignty. In response, the Iranian government pursued a multifaceted strategy combining diplomatic engagement, legal argumentation, and administrative regulation. Communications with the British embassy in Tehran emphasized demands for the dissolution of foreign post offices and their transfer to Iranian control. Simultaneously, Iranian postal administrations sought to apply national regulations and tariffs to foreign postal activities. Although these measures did not always produce immediate results, they reflect an organized and deliberate effort to defend sovereign rights under conditions of administrative weakness and external pressure. From a methodological perspective, the reliance on archival correspondence highlights both the strengths and limitations of this study. While official documents provide detailed insight into institutional decision-making and legal reasoning, they primarily reflect the perspectives of state actors and may underrepresent informal practices or local responses. Nevertheless, the consistency of the archival record allows for a reliable reconstruction of the Iranian government’s strategies and priorities in confronting foreign postal interference. Conclusions Archival documents from the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs demonstrate that the activities of British and Indian post offices in southern Iran—particularly in Abadan and Ahvaz—exceeded a temporary or technical communicative role and became instruments of colonial postal interference. The establishment and continued operation of nine post offices during and after World War I occurred despite Iran’s membership in the Universal Postal Union and in contradiction to domestic legislation, most notably the Postal Monopoly Act. These activities undermined Iran’s postal sovereignty and reduced state revenues at a critical historical juncture. The findings indicate that Iranian statesmen and postal officials were not passive in the face of foreign interference. Despite administrative weakness, internal instability, and external pressure, they employed legal, administrative, and diplomatic measures to defend national interests and assert sovereign rights. This case illustrates how administrative institutions could function as arenas of resistance within constrained political environments. The study is limited by its reliance on official archival correspondence, which primarily reflects institutional perspectives and may not fully capture local or informal responses. Nevertheless, the findings contribute to a clearer understanding of the relationship between colonial interference and state administration. Future research may benefit from comparative studies of foreign postal activity in other regions of Iran or neighboring countries, as well as closer examination of the social and economic impacts of postal interference beyond administrative institutions. با آغاز جنگ جهانی اول، دولت بریتانیا به دستور فرماندهی نظامی خود اقدام به تأسیس و راه‌اندازی نُه دفتر پستی در آبادان، اهواز و دیگر نقاط جنوب ایران کرد. تداوم فعالیت این دفاتر پس از پایان جنگ نه‌تنها ناقض حاکمیت و استقلال ایران بود، بلکه دولت را از عواید قابل توجه پستی نیز محروم می‌ساخت. ازاین‌رو، دولت ایران از یک‌سو به‌عنوان دولتی مستقل که در پی مشارکت در کنگره جهانی پست بود و از سوی دیگر به‌منظور بهره‌برداری از درآمدهای پستی، مکاتبات رسمی با سفارت بریتانیا در تهران را آغاز کرد و خواستار انحلال دفاتر نُه‌گانه و واگذاری آن‌ها به دولت ایران شد. پژوهش حاضر با بهره‌گیری از روش تحقیق اسنادی ـ تحلیلی و بر پایه اسناد آرشیوی وزارت امور خارجه، در پی پاسخ به این پرسش است که دولت ایران در شرایط نابسامان سیاسی، اقتصادی و اداری ناشی از جنگ جهانی اول چگونه با دفاتر پست هند و انگلیس مواجه شد و برای پایان دادن به مداخلات و سلطه استعماری انگلستان، با اتکا به قانون انحصار پست چه اقداماتی انجام داد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که مسئولان پستی و دولتمردان ایرانی، با وجود ضعف ساختار اداری و فشارهای خارجی، به ماهیت مداخله‌جویانه و سلطه‌طلبانه عملکرد دفاتر پستی بریتانیا آگاه بودند و از طریق پیگیری‌های اداری، حقوقی و دیپلماتیک در جهت حفظ منافع ملی و احقاق حقوق سیاسی و اقتصادی تضییع‌شده ایران تلاش کردند.

https://irhj.sbu.ac.ir/article_106618_6be5d3cc1b83e037709a75723339d522.pdf